With my recent upsurge in trail running in preparation for Western States, coupled with my corresponding upsurge in falling, I’ve been paying a lot more attention to HOW I run. To be a good looped-course, timed event runner, I have to run a lot of miles on flat surfaces. My main training focus is on physical efficiency, physical endurance and mental strength. Basically, I focus on how to run well when it’s long and boring.
This type of training has clearly not been an asset when it comes to preparing for Western States. Right now, I am training on some pretty technical (for me) trails, and the results have not been so pretty. I have fallen on about 50% of my runs, leaving me, thus far, with a torn hamstring and lots of cuts and bruises.
And up to now, all of my training has taken place during the day. What is going to happen to me when I am running at night?! I have a feeling bears are going to be the least of my problems.
Anyway, for every runner, it is all about finding the best stride for them for the specific terrain they are running on. For me, it has always been about efficiency. If I’m running for 24 hours, I don’t want to spend ANY extra energy bouncing up and down. I want to gliiiiiiiide across the road, thus minimizing effort and risk of injury from pounding. After years of running 20 miles a day, mostly on roads, I have naturally developed a very short, midfoot landing stride that allows me to run for a long time with less fatigue. It isn’t the prettiest stride, but it gets the job done.
Studies have shown that the least efficient strides that significantly add to your fatigue level are those that involve a heel-strike. According to Matt Fitzgerald, author of Iron War, “The greatest source of energy waste in running is the braking that occurs when a foot makes contact with the ground.
Those runners who brake the least when a foot lands spend the least energy trying to get back up to speed when pushing off the ground.” Basically, the most highly trained runners don’t have to regain their speed after each foot landing.
This means they are usually landing mid-foot or slightly forward, as demonstrated above. There is just less braking taking place when you land in the center of the foot (or slightly forward), and the result is more efficiency for the runner.
So, the question for me is, how do I retain my hard-earned efficiency while developing a trail-friendly stride so that I don’t die? I need a trail stride that is efficient AND safe. If not, I will have to run WS100 in body armor.
Do you have any special “tricks” to be more efficient? How about on trails?
Happy Running!
{ 14 comments }
Simple. Don’t think about it. What natural will come:)
You shoul watch “Unbreakable” the movie about the 2010(?) Western States. This guys make it look so effortless.
I hope so! And I hope it comes soon! 🙂
I’ve been trying to get the download so I can watch it while I run – I can’t wait to see it!
I’m soooo far from an expert (probably the FARTHEST from an expert of anyone…see what I did there? :D), but I’ve spent a lot of time running on trails. I fell twice on my first trail run (a race), I started out with walking pretty much every downhill on our local trails, and I’ve grown waaaay more comfortable on trails since then.
First, in my experience, I tend to fall on the easier parts of the trail, because that’s where I start to autopilot a little. At least those areas tend to have less jagged rocks when I fall. 🙂 I think the more you run on the trails the more comfortable and sure-footed you’ll be. Your ankles get stronger, your balance improves, and you choose better lines. Try not to overthink it…just get out there and run as much on the trails as you can, pay attention to where you put your feet, and slow down if you need to. You’re probably going to be faster overall if you run slightly slower but aren’t constantly picking yourself up off the ground. 🙂
Great points, Kate! So much of my problem stems from lack of confidence. Oh, and the fact that I’m as stiff as board from all the road miles 🙂 Hopefully, over time, I will get brave AND limber!
I’m pretty impressed with your war wound. In fact I’m kind of ghoulish and last year made a calendar for my squad’s coach of all the squad’s injuries that had been captured in a photo. I got a range of black and missing toenails, trail-running stacks and two full-on face plants. I don’t know if our squad’s particularly clumsy but I certainly had enough injuries to fill 12 months.
I’ve been using those tips on efficient running in my come-back. I figure the more efficiently I run, the further I can go if I have X amount of energy to spend. The only problem is that I try not to left me feet up too high which increases the chance of tripping.
A calendar of running wounds? Yes, I can see how you would end up with a full 12 months! I hope your comeback is going well. I at least know you can chase chickens – that has to be a good sign! 🙂
I’d always been a forefoot striker, but that changed when I started training for ultras. The closer I get to walking speed, the more my stride becomes a walking stride, with the heel planting and the foot rolling forward, rather than the sprinter’s lever of hitting on the ball of the foot, then the heel, then “popping” back up. Now that I’m trying to run short and fast again, I had to relearn how to have my feet land; what’s been most useful is remembering that it’s a pawing motion – then I have to work on stride rate. What I learned about running on trails would fill volumes, but the more technical the surface, the fuller you want the contact between your shoe and the ground; you want to lift your feet higher off the ground than usual to make sure you don’t snag your toes on tree roots or rocks – and it helps to remember that large objects tend to move less when you step on them!
It’s the lifting my feet that I seem to have a problem with 🙂 I’m always snagging my toe and taking a tumble – again and again. And interesting that ultras made you more of a heel striker. It has had the opposite effect on me. With all the miles I run, I have evolved into a definite midfoot striker. Much easier on the body 🙂
Weirdly, I started out as a natural forefoot striker. Then I forced myself to heel strike because I thought it was ‘right’. Then when I got a clue, I switched back. I do start shuffling a bit when I’m really tired though. I run so few trails, I have nothing of value to offer. I totally agree that midfoot striking is so much easier on the bod.
I know what you mean, Marcia. I remember a time when I was told to work harder on heel striking. Maybe it was a fad 🙂
May be forefoot striking is a fad as well. That’s why I say just allow it develop naturally, don’t force either way. Nothing is one size fits all. I have no clue and don’t care which way I strike as long as I keep running. May be heel-strike seems to break, but they land further yet mid-foot striker doesn’t break but needs to have a higher turn-over for the same length covering? Ever considered that expanding energy might be pretty close? Check out these photos of OTM and find all kinds of strides coming on top of American marathon times. https://picasaweb.google.com/102416223972681439438/OlympicTrialsMarathonHouston21412
On trail, the most important thing is to have a good eye-foot coordination and not a certain foot strike. It changes with terrain way too much to even begin to think about it.
Great thoughts, Olga! Love the photos – so fun to see those awesome runners!
Comments on this entry are closed.